下面是媒体所说的老鼠仓【ST宏盛科技】公司破产的依据：

与飞利浦起诉是否真实，不清楚！

Norcent Technology Violates Philips’ Patented DVD Technology

Keats McFarland &Wilson LLP

Philips Receives $12.8 Million Jury Verdict in Final Judgment

U.S. Philips Corporation v. International Norcent Technology, et al.,

Case No. CV 06-01366 ER (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. 2007)

Philips filed suit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against International Norcent Technology, Norcent Holdings, Inc., Shanghai Hongsheng Technology Co., Ltd., Hongpu International Development Co., Ltd. and Jennifer Long, for their willful infringement of Philips’ intellectual property rights in its patented DVD technology.

Based on Philips’ efforts, the Court entered a judgment (jury verdict) award of approximately $12.8 million for Philips against the U.S. entities and individual.

Philips is seeking enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees in addition to the $12.8 million award.

Final Jury Verdict:

Court Ruling

$12.8 Million Judgment Awarded:

Philips' Compensation

Keats McFarland &Wilson LLP

9720 Wilshire BoulevardPenthouse Suite Beverly HillsCalifornia 90212T. 310.777.3725F. 310.860.0363 http://www.kmwlaw.comjjoyner@kmwlaw.com

Jeffrey K. Joyner (Bar No. 180485)

E-mail: jjoyner@kmwlaw.com

Jai H. Rho (Bar No. 123248)

E-mail: jrho@kmwlaw.com

Samuel L. Alberstadt (Bar No. 186402)

E-mail: salberstadt@kmwlaw.com

KEATS McFARLAND &WILSON LLP

9720 Wilshire Boulevard

Penthouse Suite

Beverly Hills, California 90212

Telephone: (310) 248-3830

Facsimile: (310) 860-0363

Frank A. De Costa, III (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: frank.decosta@finnegan.com

Steven M. Anzalone (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: steven.anzalone@finnegan.com

Kenneth M. Frankel (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail : kenneth.frankel@finnegan.com

Malcolm T. Meeks (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: malcolm.meeks@finnegan.com

Joyce Craig (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: joyce.craig@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT &DUNNER, L.L.P.

901 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001-4413

Telephone: (202) 408-4000

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400

Attorneys for Plaintiff

U.S. Philips Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTERNATIONAL NORCENT

TECHNOLOGY; NORCENT

HOLDINGS, INC.; and JENNIFER

LONG,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV 06-1366-ER (PLAx)

[PROPOSED]ENTRY OF FINAL

JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The jury having returned its verdicts in this matter, 1 the Court hereby enters

final judgment in favor of Plaintiff U.S. Philips Corporation (“Philips”) and against

Defendants International Norcent Technology (“Norcent Technology”), Norcent

Holdings, Inc. (“Norcent Holdings”), and Jennifer Long (“Long”) that:

1. Defendant Norcent Technology has directly infringed, has induced

infringement, or has contributed to infringement of Claims 1 and 6 of United

States Patent No. 5,677,903 (“the ‘903 patent”), and Claims 9 and 12 of United

States Patent No. 5,463,607 (“the ‘607 patent”); and such infringement was

willful.

2. Defendant Norcent Holdings has directly infringed, has induced infringement,

or has contributed to infringement of Claims 1 and 6 of the ‘903 patent, and

Claims 9 and 12 of the ‘607 patent; and such infringement was willful.

3. Defendant Long has directly infringed, has induced infringement, or has

contributed to infringement of Claims 1 and 6 of the ‘903 patent, and Claims 9

and 12 of the ‘607 patent; and such infringement was willful.

4. Claims 1 and 6 of the ‘903 patent, and Claims 9 and 12 of the ‘607 patent are

not invalid.

5. As a result of Norcent Technology’s, Norcent Holdings’, and Long’s

infringement of the ‘903 and ‘607 patents, Norcent Technology, Norcent

Holdings, and Long are jointly and severally liable for and shall pay Philips

compensatory damages in the amount of $12,853,793.

6. Defendants Norcent Technology’s and Norcent Holdings’ Counterclaims 1

through 6 are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

1Philips intends to file subsequent papers requesting a permanent injunction,

enhanced damages, attorneys’ fees, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.

7. Defendant Long’s Counterclaims 1 through 4 are hereby dismissed with

prejudice.

8. The Court reserves jurisdiction over all issues of the present case, including

without limitation, enforcement of this Judgment. All present orders remain in

effect unless otherwise provided by the Court.

9. The Court reserves its right to amend this Judgment to include further relief for

Philips that the Court may deem appropriate. Such relief may include, without

limitation, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, and relief under 35 U.S.C.

§§ 283, 284, and 285, which provide for the Court to enter permanent injunctive

relief, to enhance the damage award, and to grant attorneys’ fees.

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve, by United States

mail, copies of this Entry of Judgment on counsel for the parties in this matter.

Honorable Edward Rafeedie

United States District Court Judge

Dated: , 2007

Respectfully submitted

By:

Jeffrey K. Joyner (CA Bar No. 180485)

Jai H. Rho (CA Bar No. 123248)

Samuel L. Alberstadt (CA Bar No. 186402)

KEATS McFARLAND &WILSON LLP

9720 Wilshire Boulevard, Penthouse Suite

Beverly Hills, California 90212

Telephone: (310) 248-3830

Facsimile: (310) 860-0363

Frank A. De Costa, III (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: frank.decosta@finnegan.com

Steven M. Anzalone (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: steven.anzalone@finnegan.com

Kenneth M. Frankel (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail : kenneth.frankel@finnegan.com

Malcolm T. Meeks (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: malcolm.meeks@finnegan.com

Joyce Craig (admitted pro hac vice)

E-mail: joyce.craig@finnegan.com

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT &DUNNER, L.L.P.

901 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001-4413

Telephone: (202) 408-4000

Facsimile: (202) 408-4400

Attorneys for Plaintiff

U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION

如果是真实的，应该在飞利浦官方网站也应该能查得到。

但是在飞利浦【荷兰】官方网站没有查到相关信息。

最后在飞利浦【印尼】官方网站查到下面信息。

Philips statement on the Norcent case

Philips is pleased with the outcome of the case as it recognizes that Norcent infringes our patents on DVD players. Philips invests huge amounts of money in research and development every year and we want other companies to respect our intellectual property. We tried to negotiate with Norcent for a long time and convince them to re-establish their license. But Norcent continued to import and sell unlicensed DVD players in the US. They did not show any respect for our intellectual property and in addition created unfair competition in the DVD player market. As an ultimate resort we had to sue them.

About Royal Philips Electronics

Royal Philips Electronics of the Netherlands (NYSE: PHG, AEX: PHI) is a global leader in healthcare, lifestyle and technology, delivering products, services and solutions through the brand promise of “sense and simplicity”. Headquartered in the Netherlands, Philips employs approximately 125,800 employees in more than 60 countries worldwide. With sales of EUR 27 billion in 2006, the company is a market leader in medical diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring systems, energy efficient lighting solutions, personal care and home appliances, as well as consumer electronics. News from Philips is located at www.philips.com/newscenter

For further information please contact:

Philips Intellectual Property &Standards:

Global &Europe:

Caroline Kamerbeek

Tel.: +31 40 27 405 88

E-mail: caroline.kamerbeek@philips.com

Asia Pacific:

Ben Shi

Tel.: + 86 10-65172288 ext. 3131

E-mail: ben.shi@philips.com

令我不解是。为什么不是飞利浦【荷兰】或飞利浦【美国 中国】官方网站而是飞利浦【印尼】官方网站呢。他是否真实？另外我此贴发到东方财富网的600817股吧上，为什么很快就被删除！这就是强势媒体吗？可能是黑庄所为！